History of Cabinet Resource Group
Creation
| Early years |
MINING ISSUES |
ROADLESS AREAS |
pROBLEMS WITH trOY mINE
| crg wins again in
court |
grizzly bear and bull
trout | mysterious barrels |
MONTANA DEQ DOES NOTHING
|
STERLING WANTS TO REOPEN |
MUCH ACTIVITY IN 2005
|
Biological opinion
invaladated
|
BULL_TROUT_DATA_CRITICIZED
|
|
CrG Wins another court
case |
Latest
Rock Creek Mine Ruling
Creation
-
In 1976,
Troy resident Bill Martin spearheaded the formation of the
Cabinet Resource Group [CRG] in response to a proposal by
Northern Lights Electrical Cooperative to dam the Kootenai River
at the Kootenai Falls. A start-up grant was provided by the
Sierra Club. CRG aligned itself with the Confederated Kootenai
and Salish Tribes and that joint venture defeated the dam
proposal.
Early Years
-
Three
years later, 1979, the American Smelting and Refining
Corporation [ASARCO] proposed a 52 million ton copper/silver
mine, the Troy Mine Project. A permit was granted in 1980 for
the mine. CRG undertook legal action and won a landmark decision
in the Montana District Court which established the substantive
nature of Environmental Impact Statements under the Montana
Environmental Policy Act.
Mining Issues
-
The ensuing
four years had CRG opposing and monitoring Asarco and U.S. Borax
exploratory drilling in the Cabinet Mountain Wilderness [CMW].
This lead to the proposal of two very extensive mines, one for
U.S. Borax and the other for ASARCO. CRG participated in the
development of an Environmental Impact Statement for each mine.
US
Borax subsequently sold its claims to Noranda Minerals which
received a permit [1990] to develop an exploration audit for its
now named Montanore Mine. In 1991 CRG discovered water quality
violations at Montanore and filed suit against the Montana
Department of Environmental Quality [DEQ] to enforce quality
standards or terminate the permit for the adit. Noranda
[Nov.,1992] shut down operations. The following year [1993]
Noranda received an Operating Permit for the Montanore Mine, but
low market prices for ore at that time lead to the abandonment
of the project for the time being.
The ASARCO
proposed mine, Rock Creek Mine, was doggedly pursued by that
company and it lead, in 1995, to CRG forming the Rock Creek
Alliance as a spin-off to bring national attention to the issue
of mining in the Cabinet Mountain Wilderness and centralize
efforts to defeat the Rock Creek Mine.

Roadless Areas
-
During the years 1983 through 1987, CRG
was active in the development of the Kootenai Forest Plan in
conjunction with the Montana Wilderness Association and the
appeal process of that Plan to protect 10 additional inventoried
Roadless Areas not proposed in the original Plan.
BACK TO TOP
Problems with Troy MinE
-
For much of two decades, 1980s and
1990s, CRG was occupied for
a considerable
time with the Troy Mine. In 1995, CRG discovered
copper/silver/lead concentrate levels to be 2000 times the EPA
criteria at the Troy Mine load-out facility in the heart of
downtown Troy, Montana. Follow-up actions by CRG resulted in
Montana DEQ and ASARCO undertaking remediation clean up and
dismantling the load-out facility.
CRG wins again in court
-
In 1997, citing unpermitted discharges into area water from the Troy
Tailing
impoundment, CRG filed a lawsuit under the Clean Water Act. The
suit was conditionally settled in the Fall of 1997, granting CRG
unprecedented access and funding ($450,000) to conduct ground
water characterization and monitoring at Troy and Proposed
Rock Creek Mine (PRCM) tailings impoundment sites. In late
1999 ASARCO sold the Troy Mine to Sterling Mine Company, but
maintained the Operating Permit. That same year, DEQ notified
ASARCO that the Troy Mine Reclamation Plan is outdated and
needed revision.

GRIZZLY BEAR AND BULL TROUT -
The first five years of this century found CRG undertaking many
actions related to grizzly bears and bull trout in Kootenai
National Forest as it related to Rock Creek Mine. Lawsuits were
filed by CRG and other groups.
Biological Opinions were
withdrawn. Operating Permits were withdrawn. Lawsuits were put
on hold. New Biological Opinions were released. The Operating
Permit was reissued. The lawsuit was renewed.
BACK TO TOP
MYSTERIOUS BARRELS
-
CRG. in 2002,
filed suit for another problem with ASARCO. The nucleus of the
matter was CRG alleging that ASARCO buried hazardous –
industrial solvents – in the Troy tailings impoundment. ASARCO
denied burying anything. CRG hired a Missoula firm to undertake
geophysical and ground penetrating radar explorations of the
impoundment site as part of the legal discovery process. The
following year ASARCO, subpoenaed for an interrogatory, admitted
burying barrels of waste, but denied the contents are
hazardous. The judge then awarded CRG $28,000 for costs of the
study and sanctioned joint ASARCO/CRG excavation.
MONTANA DEQ DOES NOTHING -
The firm hired to do the ground
penetrating radar study, which found evidence of the barrels,
prepared a plan for submittal the Montana DEQ for excavating the
barrels to determine the contents. DEQ did nothing and still, as
of 2011, has done nothing.
STERLING WANTS TO REOPEN
-
During
2003-2004, Sterling Mining Co [see above, CRG Wins in Court
Again] and its subsidiary, Genesis, start action to reopen the
Troy Mine. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reissued its
Biological Opinion for the Proposed Rock Creek Mine.
BACK TO TOP
MUCH ACTIVITY IN 2005
-
Kootenai
National Forest issued its decision regarding Grizzly
Bear/Motorized Access Management Amendment [see above, Grizzly
Bear and Bull Trout]. CRG files lawsuit. The Forest Revision
Plan process, begun in 2003, continued. The Federal District
Court ruled the Biological Opinion [see above, Sterling Wants to
Reopen] was faulty and ordered it to be redone by Fish and
Wildlife Service. ASARCO declared bankruptcy. CRG launched
another spin-off, Friends of Scotchman Peaks Wilderness, to lead
the drive to create that wilderness area.
BIOLOGICAL OPINION
INVALIDATED - Late
in 2006, the Federal District Court invalidated the Biological
Opinion [see above paragraph] and ordered it to be redone by
Kootenai National Forest. CRG filed an affidavit with Montana
Dept, of Environmental Quality alleging violations of the Troy
Mine Reclamation Plan and the Montana Metal Mine Act. Sterling
Mining Company changed its name to Revett Minerals & Mining and
went public in Canada.
BACK TO TOP

BULL TROUT DATA CRITICIZED -
In January,
2007, Avista Corporation – owners of Noxon Rapids and Cabinet
Gorge Dams on the Clark Fork River – issued a blistering critique
of Bull Trout data in the Biological Opinion for the Proposed
Rock Creek Mine [see above, Sterling Wants to Reopen]. CRG and
its colleagues sent a letter to Fish and Wildlife Service asking
that the Biological Opinion be withdrawn. Three months later
Fish and Wildlife Service said it will reinitiate consultation
on the Biological Opinion.
CRG
WINS ANOTHER COURT CASE
-
CRG WINS ANOTHER COURT CASE. After seven
long years of waiting for the finished version of the Troy Mine
Reclamation Plan, CRG went to court against the Montana DEQ and
Revettt/Sterling/Genesis Mining Company. DEQ and Revett asked
for dismissal of the suit. The Court ruled against dismissal and
stipulated that there be a progress report from DEQ by
September, 2008. As of May, 2011 no final decision has been
made.
BACK TO TOP
PROPOSED ROCK CREEK MINE ADIT-
In 2008-2009,
the Kootenai National Forest and Montana DEQ began an
Environmental Analysis of the Proposed Rock Creek Mine Adit.
Issues arose regarding the groundwater disposal method and the
possible likelihood of major failure of Montana Highway 200
which is in close proximity to the mine site. CRG contracted
for expert analysis of the pending problem. Kootenai Nat.
Forest and Montana DEQ issued a Record of Decision approving the
Exploration Adit methodology.

Latest Rock Creek Mine
Ruling – On March
29, 2010, U.S. District Court Judge Malloy issued a ruling,
which – in part – states…..
“The Forest Service’s decision to approve the Rock
Creek Mine Project
is vacated, and the 2003 Record of Decision and 2001
Final Environmental
Impact Statement are set aside and remanded to the
Forest Service for
further action consistent with the Court’s
forthcoming opinion.
Interested in participating?
Contact us!